The process of voting was simple. An informed open-air meeting (the contio) was held, at which the presiding magistrate explained the measures that were to come before the Assembly (the comitia curiata) and invited officials and prominent citizens to discuss them. This was the only opportunity for debate. Then the meeting reconvened as the Assembly. The presiding officer stated the question and the voters separated into thirty-five groups by districts . . . A majority determined the vote of the district, which was at once reported to the magistrate in charge. The votes of the eighteen or more districts carried of defeated a bill.

–
Unlike Athenian Greece, Rome had no understanding of or at the very least did not prefer direct democracy. Instead the majority of the tribe held the vote, and in turn the majority of tribes held the decision of the day. Only Roman citizen with ius suffragiorum could join in the count, and a citizen had to be in Rome on the day of the vote to take part. With no no absentee ballots or early voting options, this posed some difficulty to the good agrarian Roman who was more concerned with crops or military service to bother with making the long and arduous trip up to Rome. In time this disparagement would not lend itself to an optimally healthy state politic.
–
This post is a part of the Cicero series, reading This Was Cicero, by H.J. Haskell.


As for hard drinking, it was the accepted thing. A statesman was proud to be know as a one-bottle, two-bottle, three-bottle man . . . Cæsar was abstemious, but the fact that this was remarked upon showed it was rather unusual. The great Marius had ended his life in a prolonged drunk. There were scandalous reports of the drinking parties of Sulla after he laid down his dictatorship. Cato at times would spend a whole night over his wine. Mark Antony was a terrific drinker. Cicero was blameless in his habits, be we have a letter that he wrote to a friend about a dispute at dinner over their wine in which he speaks of returning home “at a late hour comfortably mellow.” It was reputed to be the high ambition of his irresponsible son to outdrink Mark Antony. He was so successful that on one occasion because a minor scandal by throwing a drinking cup at a distinguished general. Long drinking parties after formal dinners were common. While Italian wines were not so potent as the liquors served in England, continued drinking could send the guests staggering into the streets prepared for any wild adventure.
